Legal Opinion
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 16, 2014No. 13-193PublishedCited by 562 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
Petitioners in this case seek to challenge an Ohio statute that prohibits certain "false statements" during the course of a political campaign. The question in this case is whether their preenforcement challenge to that law is justiciable-and in particular, whether they have alleged a sufficiently imminent injury for the purposes of Article III. We conclude that they have.
I
The Ohio statute at issue prohibits certain "false statement[s]" "during the course of any campaign for nomination or election to public office or office of a political party." Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 3517.21(B) (Lexis 2013).…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by562 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
557 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.