Legal Opinion

Vetor v. Shockey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1980No. 2-279A44PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Judy and Richard Shockey filed a small claims action against Thomas Vetor on April 24, 1978, alleging that they had purchased a house from Vetor in October of 1977, that Vetor had warranted that the septic tank was in working order, but that in fact the septic system needed extensive repair. After a bench trial the court found the following:

“[T]he defendant is liable to the plaintiff for latent defects not discoverable by the plaintiff’s reasonable inspection which manifested themselves after the purchase of the realty in question. This being specifically, that there was an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Barnes v. Mac Brown and Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. PenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Zimmerman v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Suyoung Choung v. IemmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Kaminszky v. KukuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Kissel v. RosenbaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API