Legal Opinion

Kaminszky v. Kukuch

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1990No. 46A03-8905-CV-188PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Judit and Tibor Kaminszky appeal from a negative judgment in favor of Abel W. Kukuch. They had sought to have the sale of a house rescinded for breach of an implied warranty of fitness for habitation.

The Kaminszkys present four issues which we consolidate and restate as:

1. Whether Kukuch, as seller, is liable for a breach of the implied warranty of fitness for habitation?

2. Whether Kukuch had a duty to disclose the presence of urea-formaldehyde foam insulation?

3. Whether a clause in the purchase agreement stating the buyers accepted the house “as is”, and that the buyers relied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Mac Brown and Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Theis v. HeuerIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Vetor v. ShockeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Callander v. SheridanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Northwest Calf Farms, Inc. v. PoirierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Sand Creek Country Club, Ltd. v. CSO Architects, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Davis v. SponhauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Whitten v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API