Legal Opinion

Kissel v. Rosenbaum

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1991No. 87A01-9104-CV-116PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Waldemar and Melva Kissel appeal from an adverse bench trial judgment on Mark and Nona Rosenbaum's complaint to quiet title and for damages for breach of implied warranty of fitness for habitation. On appeal, they bring the following issues:

I. Did the Court improperly enter a judgment against the Kissels as individuals when they were not parties as individuals to the transaction underlying this dispute, but were instead officers of the corporation that was a party to the transaction and which was not made a party to the litigation?

II. Did the Court improperly enter a judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Sharon Gill, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. R.N. Thompson & Associates, Inc. v. Wickes Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Columbia/CSA-HS Greater Columbia Healthcare System, LP v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API