Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1974No. 235PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The Employers Mutual policy provided, among other things, under its uninsured motorist coverage and medical payment coverage, it would pay all sums which the insured shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the operator of an uninsured highway vehicle because of bodily injury sustained by the insured. The coverage was limited to $10,000 per person and $20,000 per accident and further provided that under the uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage, the company was not obligated to pay any part of the damage the insured was entitled to recover from the operator of an uninsured…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API