Legal Opinion
Alex Taksir v. Vanguard Group
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 4, 2018No. 17-3585PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.
In this matter, we consider whether the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards *96 Act of 1998 ("SLUSA"), 15 U.S.C. § 78bb, bars investors' claims that their broker overcharged them and similarly situated plaintiffs for the execution of certain securities transactions. The broker-the Vanguard Group ("Vanguard")-appeals the partial denial of its motion to dismiss the claims against it and the denial of its motion for reconsideration. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that SLUSA does not bar the relevant claims. Therefore, we will affirm.
I
Vanguard is an investment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ryan Rowinski, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., Ryan RowinskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Lindie Banks v. Northern Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Edward Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- AKOL v. CARNEYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Abrantes v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Amerco Real Estate Company v. First American Title Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.