Legal Opinion

AKOL v. CARNEY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00026Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASHOL AKOL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:20-cv-26-SPB ) THOMAS CARNEY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ashol Akol commenced this pro se civil action by filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. [1], and attaching to it a complaint directed against Thomas Carney, a magisterial district judge in Erie County. See ECF No. 1-1. It appears from the complaint that Plaintiff’s grievances stem from an unspecified adverse ruling issued by the Defendant in his capacity as a magisterial district…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API