Legal Opinion
Ryan Rowinski, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., Ryan Rowinski
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 2005No. 03-4762PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”) provides for the removal and federal preemption of certain ' state court class actions alleging “a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security.” 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(l)(A) (West Supp.2004). At issue is whether this action on behalf of a putative class of Salomon Smith Barney retail brokerage customers is preempted by SLUSA.
Plaintiff Ryan Rowinski filed this class suit in Pennsylvania state court alleging Salomon Smith…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Romano v. KazacosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Albert Flora, Jr. v. County of LuzerneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Alex Taksir v. Vanguard GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.