Legal Opinion
Coats v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 12, 2003No. 97 CV 0285 MS; A105379PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court. Coats v. ODOT, 334 Or 587, 54 P3d 610 (2002). We reverse and remand.
The Supreme Court concluded that we erred in basing our initial decision, Coats v. ODOT, 170 Or App 32, 11 P3d 258 (2000), on defendant’s argument concerning the construction of the term “upon all public works” as used in ORS 279.350 and as implemented in OAR 839-016-0004 (1997) and OAR 839-016-0035. The court determined that “the validity of BOLI’s rules is not relevant to resolving whether ODOT is liable for breach of contract * * *. The circuit court,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Koch v. SpannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Oregon Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Lenon v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- McLain v. Maletis BeverageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Coats-Sellers v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.