Legal Opinion

Oregon Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Oregon State Lottery

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 2005No. 98C-12676; A114146PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The Oregon State Lottery and the Oregon State Lottery Commission — which, unless otherwise indicated, we refer to collectively as “the lottery” — adopted a rule that states a policy of not contracting with businesses whose “dominant use or dominant purpose” is making money from lottery games. The lottery incorporated that rule into contracts with establishments that sell lottery products. This case involves the interpretation and application of such contracts with petitioner, which operates restaurants that sell lottery products.

In brief, the lottery sent letters to petitioner informing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gustafson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeLeon, Inc. v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Hawes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Lenon v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Grobovsky v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. OR-OSHA v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API