Legal Opinion

People v. Madrid

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 9, 1998No. 98SA370PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This lawyer discipline case involves a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the complainant and the respondent, David Edmund Madrid. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission, which included a recommendation that Madrid be suspended for three years from the practice of law, was approved by an inquiry panel of the grievance committee. We now accept the conditional admission and order that Madrid be suspended for three years.

I

David Edmund Madrid was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1980. He was immediately suspended from the practice of law on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API