People v. Boyer
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
This lawyer discipline proceeding comes to us on a stipulation, agreement and condition*1362al admission of misconduct between the respondent and the deputy disciplinary counsel. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommends discipline in the range of a public censure to a suspension for 180 days, under certain conditions. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission with the recommendation of the suspension and conditions. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. FahseltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- People v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Earp v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Ricky Lee Earp v. John Stokes, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.