Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 2006No. Misc. Docket AG No. 12, Sept. Term, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

894 A.2d 602 (2006)

391 Md. 673

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

Leslie Blish HOLT.

Misc. Docket AG No. 12, Sept. Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 16, 2006.

Marianne J. Lee, Asst. Bar Counsel (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Atty. Grievance Com'n), for petitioner.

John Thomas Maloney, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

BELL, C.J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751,[1] approved the filing by Bar Counsel of a Petition For Disciplinary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API