Legal Opinion

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Jarrell

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1999No. 24009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RISOVICH, Judge:

This disciplinary proceeding was instituted when charges were filed against Cecelia G. Jarrell, a member of the West Virginia State Bar, by the Investigative Panel of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board (“Board”). Ms. Jar-rell was charged with violating Rules 8.4(d), 4.2, 3.4(e), 3.8(b) and 3.5(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct in a five-count complaint. The Board’s Hearing Panel Subcommittee (referred to as “HPS” and sometimes the “Board”) found insufficient evidence to support the alleged violations in three of the counts;1 however, the HPS found that Ms. Jarrell violated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics v. RoarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. MullinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Mark S. PlantsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API