Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Mark S. Plants
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Justice:
This lawyer disciplinary proceeding is before, the Court upon the written objection of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board (“LDB”) to the sanctions recommended by the Hearing Panel Subcommittee (“HPS”) of the LDB. The HPS found that Respondent Mark S. Plants violated three provisions of the West Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended that Mr. Plants be publicly reprimanded and pay the costs of these proceedings. Mr. Plants does not challenge the recommended sanctions.
The ■ ODC asserts that the appropriate sanction in this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. David S. HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
- LBD v. HatfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MarcumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021