Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Department of Industrial Relations

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1929No. Docket No. 6601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

The purpose of this proceeding is to review an order of award of compensation made by the respondent tribunal, known as Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Industrial Accidents and Safety, to one Tyler for injuries sustained by him in the course of his employment.

From the petition for a writ of review and the return thereto, briefly, but so far as are here essential, the facts which said respondent tribunal was justified in assuming were established by the evidence, appear to be that one Johnson, who was a building contractor, was engaged in the construction of a house which, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Riggins v. Lincoln Tent & Awning Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Becker v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Brothers v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. ExamWorks, LLC v. BaldiniDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API