Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 25, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1475 (PLF)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court will grant the former and deny the latter.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff submits his pleading on a preprinted form and attaches to it a typewritten statement and hundreds of pages of unnumbered exhibits which appear to have been assembled in no particular order. The Court has waded through this pleading and its attachments (which together it will refer to as the complaint) and discerns claims for injunctive…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Martinez, Robert v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. Albright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Toolasprashad v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Jane Doe v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Schotz v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Truesdale v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Hall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Reeves v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API