Legal Opinion
Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision v. Ernst & Young
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 16, 1992No. Misc. 91-401 (RCL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case first came before the court on January 28, 1992, for a hearing on petitioner’s petition for summary enforcement of an administrative subpoena duces tecum served upon Ernst & Young. On March 3, 1992, 786 F.Supp. 46, the court granted OTS’ petition to enforce the subpoena. The court also directed the parties to endeavor to agree upon the conditions governing the enforcement of the subpoena and to file supplemental memoranda with respect to the issues upon which they could not agree. Since March 3,1992, the parties have met on three occasions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision v. Ernst & YoungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amnesty International USA v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Loftin v. BandeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. ThorntonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 30, 1992District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.