Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Thornton

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 9, 1992No. Misc. A. No. 92-94PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

The Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”) seeks enforcement of three subpoenas duces tecum it served on respondent Grant Thornton (“Grant”), an accounting firm, on August 22 and September 27, 1991. The RTC is investigating Grant to determine Grant’s potential civil liability in connection with Grant’s past audits of three failed savings and loan associations. In. two of those cases, CitySavings and Metropolitan, Grant seeks to modify the subpoenas by requiring the RTC to give Grant ten days’ notice before using the disclosed material in other investigations…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lakeshore v. FDICDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Tarr v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API