Legal Opinion
Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision v. Ernst & Young
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 3, 1992No. Misc. 91-401 (RCL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case comes before the court upon a petition by the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) for an order requiring Ernst & Young to show cause why it should not be required to comply with an administrative subpoena duces tecum served upon Ernst & Young, and for an order requiring the production of certain records and documents as set forth in that subpoena. For the following reasons, OTS’s petition shall be granted and the subpoena shall be enforced.
I. FACTS
On May 15, 1991, OTS authorized formal examination and investigation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision v. Ernst & YoungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Martin v. GardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Pattison Bros. Mississippi River Terminal, Inc. v. Iowa District Court for Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2001