People v. Kirkland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: County Court conducted a Sandoval hearing in chambers, in defendant’s absence, wherein it ruled on the permissible scope of the cross-examination of defendant regarding his prior convictions. All that occurred in defendant’s presence was a recitation by County Court of the decision it reached in chambers in defendant’s absence.
Defendant’s absence from the in-chambers Sandoval hearing violated his constitutional and statutory right to be present at all material stages of his trial (see, US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BeasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. GebroskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. EadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. BrowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993