Legal Opinion

People v. Kirkland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: County Court conducted a Sandoval hearing in chambers, in defendant’s absence, wherein it ruled on the permissible scope of the cross-examination of defendant regarding his prior convictions. All that occurred in defendant’s presence was a recitation by County Court of the decision it reached in chambers in defendant’s absence.

Defendant’s absence from the in-chambers Sandoval hearing violated his constitutional and statutory right to be present at all material stages of his trial (see, US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. BeasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. GebroskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. EadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. BrowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API