Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgments unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant’s absence from the in-chambers Sandoval hearing violated his constitutional and statutory right to be present at all material stages of his trial (see, US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 6; CPL 260.20; People v Alexander, 80 NY2d 801; People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Brown, 195 AD2d 1055 [decided herewith]; People v Dean, 188 AD2d 1082; People v Kirkland, 188 AD2d 1083; People v Eady, 185 AD2d 678, lv denied 80 NY2d 929).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. EadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API