Legal Opinion

People v. Beasley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656).

Defendant’s failure to raise an objection when the trial court proceeded to conduct a Sandoval (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) hearing in his absence is not an obstacle to our review (People v Dokes, supra, at 662). Since his presence was required at this material stage, which in the circumstances of this case inferentially and directly affected the prosecutor’s trial strategy to cross-examine defendant with respect to drug-related activities — he had no prior criminal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. GebroskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. TowndrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. MontoyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API