People v. Beasley
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656).
Defendant’s failure to raise an objection when the trial court proceeded to conduct a Sandoval (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) hearing in his absence is not an obstacle to our review (People v Dokes, supra, at 662). Since his presence was required at this material stage, which in the circumstances of this case inferentially and directly affected the prosecutor’s trial strategy to cross-examine defendant with respect to drug-related activities — he had no prior criminal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. GebroskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. TowndrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. MontoyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.