Legal Opinion
People v. Eady
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his exclusion from the Sandoval hearing requires reversal. In defendant’s absence County Court conducted a Sandoval conference in chambers wherein it ruled on the permissible scope of defendant’s cross-examination relative to his prior convictions. Defense counsel, with defendant present, subsequently placed on the record his understanding of the Sandoval conference and the court’s ruling. In People v Alexander (174 AD2d 996, revd 80 NY2d 801), a virtually identical Sandoval procedure was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.