Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Gailey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1980No. 12863Published

1Opinion of the Court

606 P.2d 90 (1980)

100 Idaho 796

Martin ANDERSON and Bernice Boyer, Plaintiffs,

v.

George GAILEY, Defendant.

Jeff STOKER, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

James ANNEST, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 12863.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 6, 1980.

Jeff Stoker, Twin Falls, for petitioner-appellant.

James Annest, Burley, for defendant-respondent.

BAKES, Justice.

This appeal concerns the right of the appellant Stoker, an attorney, to a portion of the contingent fee provided for in respondent Annest's attorney fee contract with his clients who discharged respondent without cause and retained appellant, who negotiated a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API