Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1972No. 71-1516PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Per curiam
Robert A. Frame is a manufacturer and seller of methamphetamine. He was charged, tried, and found guilty of four federal narcotics violations, receiving concurrent sentences on the four counts. On June 2, 1971, his conviction was affirmed by a panel of this court. Frame v. United States, 9 Cir., 444 F.2d 71.
While the appeal was pending Frame filed a motion for a new trial in the district court, based upon “newly discovered evidence” that his pretrial and trial counsel, Donald Wolfram, had a conflict of interest because he also represented one John Pike, one of Frame’s customers and a dealer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norton Edward Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Miguel Moran Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Daniel Smith, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Felix Ferina v. United States of America, Anthony J. Biase v. United States of America, Anthony Cardarella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. GracianiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Raymond EaglinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Edward Grady PartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.