Legal Opinion

Rakes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1947No. 5614-5620PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for violation of the provisions of the National Banking Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 21 et seq. Pending the appeal a motion was made by defendants to remand the cause to the District Court in order that that court might pass on a motion for new trial made on the ground that evidence had been discovered since the trial that an attempt had been made to bribe one of the jurors. We denied the motion to remand but in the order denying it pointed out that motion might be made before the trial judge under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 33, 18 U.S.C.A.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. RakesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1947

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. Wayne Earl EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Howell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  5. Metcalf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API