Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1996No. 96-130PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Beth Sorensen was injured in a two-vehicle accident. The Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, ruled that because she and her husband Mark settled with the liability carrier for the driver of the other vehicle, they were precluded from seeking, in this action, underinsured motorist coverage from their own insurance carrier. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

We here determine that the District Court erred in ruling that the Sorensens may not recover an underinsured motorist claim after releasing the tortfeasor without their insurer’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kapadia v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Bennett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mulholland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. McCracken v. City of ChinookMontana Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Taylor v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API