Legal Opinion

Beard v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1955No. 35422PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

1. The ordinance under which the defendant was convicted requires that “Every licensed barber and apprentice in the city, after minimum price agreements or opening and closing agreements are operative under this article, shall procure an annual permit from the city barber board to practice under any such agreement. . . The annual fee for permits shall be five dollars.” This ordinance is attacked as unconstitutional as being in violation of Code (Ann.) § 2-401, as follows: “Laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation throughout the State, and no special law shall be enacted in any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. HudginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Home Insurance v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. Burch v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  5. City of Waycross v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cambron v. CogburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Hannah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. City of Columbus v. Atlanta Cigar Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API