Legal Opinion
Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 2008No. 05-146PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 Appellants Kim and Cindy Kafka, Jack and Myra Bridgewater, and Jim and Barbara Bouma appeal an order of the Twelfth Judicial District Court denying their takings claims against the state of Montana and the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP), an agency of the state of Montana. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 Appellants in this case are all owners and operators of alternative livestock game farms (Game Farms) within the state of Montana. To operate a Game Farm, the owner/operator must have a valid alternative Game Farm license (License) issued by FWP. The requirements…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Mark Ibsen, Inc. v. Caring for Montanans, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.