Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Professional Engineers in California Government
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2004No. Nos. 02-16397, 02-16461PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Professional Engineers in California Government (“PECG”) is the exclusive bargaining agent for a unit of California state employees and has entered into a collective-bargaining agreement with the state. The agreement contains a union ■ security clause. Plaintiffs are engineers who are members of the bargaining unit but nonmembers of PECG. As such, they are obligated to pay “fair-share” fees.
Plaintiffs allege (1) that PECG failed to provide proper notice to fee payers as required by Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 106 S.Ct. 1066, 89…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Communications Workers of America v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Samson v. Nama Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Public Disclosure Comm. v. WeaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.