Legal Opinion

Samson v. Nama Holdings, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2010No. Nos. 09-55835, 09-56394PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The mandate is recalled. The order filed for publication on December 15, 2010 is amended as follows:

First, delete the sentence that reads:

As to Appeal No. 09-55835, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its May 20, 2009 Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Arbitration.

and replace it with:

As to Appeal No. 09-55835, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its May 20, 2009 Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, attached as Appendix A.

Second, attach as Appendix A the May 20, 2009 district court Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Marilyn Monroe LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. In re Zappos.com, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
  3. Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  4. Quevedo v. MACY'S, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. Tavilla v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API