Samson v. Nama Holdings, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The mandate is recalled. The order filed for publication on December 15, 2010 is amended as follows:
First, delete the sentence that reads:
As to Appeal No. 09-55835, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its May 20, 2009 Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Arbitration.
and replace it with:
As to Appeal No. 09-55835, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its May 20, 2009 Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, attached as Appendix A.
Second, attach as Appendix A the May 20, 2009 district court Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. Marilyn Monroe LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re Zappos.com, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Quevedo v. MACY'S, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Tavilla v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.