San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the Interior
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTION TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (DOC. 623)
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District joined by Plaintiff-in-intervention Stockton East Water District (collectively the “water authority plaintiffs”) move for leave to file a supplemental complaint concerning Interior’s accounting of the 2004 water year. (Doc. 632, Motion; Doc. 634, Joinder.) The United States Department of the Interior, et al., (the “federal defendants”) oppose. (Doc. 629.) Plaintiffs in the consolidated action, the Bay Institute of San…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bromley v. Michigan Education Ass'n-NEADistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- United States v. ReitenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- (PC) Bradford v. UsherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Drake v. McComasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Nedd v. LandonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.