Legal Opinion

Cowan v. City of Aspen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 3, 1973No. 25995PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

The primary issue in this case is whether the trial court was correct in declaring the three-year durational residency charter requirement for candidates for mayor and councilman of the City of Aspen to be in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The controversy here also brings into focus a secondary issue of whether the State statute requiring one-year’s residence for candidates for municipal office is constitutionally valid.

On the primary issue, we hold that the trial court’s judgment invalidating as unconstitutional the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mogk v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
  4. Mahlon D. Green v. James B. McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. McKinney v. KaminskyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brimmer v. ThomsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Grano v. OrtisiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Joseph v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Jeffrey v. Colorado State Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API