Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Allison

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1997No. 13 E.D. Appeal Docket 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur to address the issue of whether the trial court erred in allowing a lay person to testify as to the condition of a rape victim’s hymen. We find that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting such testimony. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

Following a jury trial, Appellant, Donald R. Allison, was convicted of statutory rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and aggravated indecent assault. Appellant’s motion for a new trial and arrest of judgment was denied and he was sentenced to an aggregate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Travellers Insurance v. Heppenstall Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Baum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. GauseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. MinerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. BardoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API