Commonwealth v. Allison
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allocatur to address the issue of whether the trial court erred in allowing a lay person to testify as to the condition of a rape victim’s hymen. We find that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting such testimony. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.
Following a jury trial, Appellant, Donald R. Allison, was convicted of statutory rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and aggravated indecent assault. Appellant’s motion for a new trial and arrest of judgment was denied and he was sentenced to an aggregate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Travellers Insurance v. Heppenstall Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Baum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. GauseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MinerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BardoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.