Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Foy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1992No. 93 W.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur to consider as a question of first impression whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence testimony that following the Appellant’s arrest, no further crimes of the type that the Appellant was accused of were reported. We find that the admission of such evidence was error; however, the error in the case sub judice was harmless.

Between February 2 and August 25, 1987, four elderly women in the Borough of Homestead, Pennsylvania, were sexually assaulted in the bedrooms of their homes. The unique pattern of these crimes indicated that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. CargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. BondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. LopezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API