Legal Opinion

Travellers Insurance v. Heppenstall Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1948No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

An insurance company is seeking in these proceedings to obtain, by judicial decree, the cancellation of one of its policies on the ground that the insured made fraudulent representations in his application for the policy.

Leo A. Daines applied to plaintiff, The Travellers Insurance Company, on, August 22, 1945, for a policy of insurance upon his life in the amount of $50,000, naming defendant, Heppenstall Company, his employer, as beneficiary. On September 13, 1945 plaintiff issued the policy and defendant paid the initial premium of $2,214.50. Daines died on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Paxos v. Jarka CorporationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Bailey v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Piccinini v. Teachers Protective Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. STINGER (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Fleet Messenger Service, Inc. v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Lynch v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API