Legal Opinion

Armentrout v. Hughes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1958No. 521PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The assignments of error raise questions as to the competency of evidence, the accuracy and propriety of the *632charge, and the adjudication that plaintiff take nothing when, as a matter of law, he was, on the admissions made in the pleadings, entitled to at least nominal damages which would entitle him to costs. G.S. 6-1.

Basic to a decision of each assignment of error is the correct interpretation of our statute permitting recovery of damages for the wrongful death of another.

English common law, adopted as the law of our State, gave no right of action for damages for tortious killing of a human…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Jeremiah M. Kesler v. . William A. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Lamm v. LorbacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gay v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Heddin v. Delhi Gas Pipeline CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. In Re the Estate of IvesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API