Legal Opinion

Regent Insurance v. Economy Preferred Insurance

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided October 19, 1990No. 90-1102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, District Judge.

Before the Court are a Motion by the Plaintiff (“Regent”) for summary judgment (# 7) and a Cross-Motion by the Defendant (“Economy”) for summary judgment (# 9). The Court denies the Plaintiff’s Motion (#7) and grants the Defendant’s Motion (# 9).

BACKGROUND

This litigation involves a Complaint for a declaratory judgment brought under Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 2201. This Court has jurisdiction based upon complete diversity between the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Regent is incorporated in Wisconsin, and it has its principal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Neubauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Tri-Par Investments, L.L.C. v. SousaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bannock Building Co. v. SahlbergIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API