Legal Opinion

Rausch v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 8, 2005No. Misc. No. 6, September Term, 2004. No. 128, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Sept. Term, 2004.

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

It is not uncommon for a fire insurance policy to contain a subrogation clause that permits the insurer to recover, from any person (other than the insured) who causes a covered loss under the policy, amounts paid by the insurer by reason of that loss. Under such a clause, the insurer stands in the shoes of the insured and can seek to recover those amounts to the same extent that the insured could have recovered them from the person causing the loss, had there been no insurance.

The question before us in the two cases that we have consolidated for appellate purposes is under what…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Rock Springs Realty, Inc. v. WaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Wichita City Lines, Inc. v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1956

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Dattel Family Ltd. Partnership v. WintzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. LBM Realty, LLC, d/b/a Summer Place Apartments v. Hillary ManniaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API