Legal Opinion

Bannock Building Co. v. Sahlberg

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1994No. 20943PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of respondents who were found to be additional insureds under their landlord’s fire insurance policy. We vacate the order granting summary judgment, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Respondents Tom Sahlberg (Sahlberg) and Robert A. Baker (Baker) are partners in Micro Solutions (Micro, and collectively, the Micro parties). At some time before November 1990, Sahlberg negotiated a month to month tenancy with Sy Block (Block), owner of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API