State v. Grindheim

¶1 Shane Grindheim (Grindheim) appeals from the jury verdict rendered in the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, finding him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent under § 45-5-503, MCA. We affirm.

¶2 Grindheim raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Grindheim’s motion for directed verdict on the issue of penetration?

¶4 Did the District Court abuse its discretion by requiring Grindheim to choose between a continuance to prepare for a State witness or losing the opportunity for his expert to testify?

¶5 Did the District…