Legal Opinion

State v. Jay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2013No. DA 10-0269PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Corey Brooks Jay (Jay) appeals from the judgment of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court adjudging him guilty of two counts of negligent homicide and two counts of negligent endangerment. He challenges the District Court’s rulings, which denied his challenge of a prospective juror for cause, excluded his expert witness from testifying about complex partial seizures, denied his request for a lesser-included offense jury instruction, and ordered him to pay $600 in restitution to the State and an undetermined amount of restitution to the victims and their family members for mental health…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. ChampagneMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. James CuddMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. M. DulaneyMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. C. RussellMontana Supreme Court · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API