Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Carey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2004No. 72A01-0308-CV-315PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RATLIFEF, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs-Appellants Bernard W. Hopper and Rettie Hopper ("the Hoppers") appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Continental Western Insurance Company ("Continental").

We affirm.

ISSUE

The parties present the following restated issue for our review: Whether the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Continental on the issue of the application of the set-off provision in the insurance contract regarding underinsured motorist benefits, and whether that order also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. American Family Life Assurance Co. v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. WuethrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Monar v. HurtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bellville v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Masten v. Amco Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Sharvelle v. MagnanteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Eckman v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Save the Valley, Inc. v. Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API