Legal Opinion

Monar v. Hurt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 2003No. 82A01-0211-CV-429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOK, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-plaintiff Jeffrey L. Monar appeals the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of appellee-defen-dant John R. Hurt. We affirm.

Issue

Monar raises two issues for review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment in Hurt’s favor.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to Monar as the non-moving party indicate that in approximately 1985, Monar and Hurt entered into an oral partnership to purchase, operate, and service amusement machines. Under the agreement,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bennett v. Crownlife InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Searles v. HaynesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crum v. City of Terre Haute ex rel. Department of RedevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Hopper v. CareyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API