Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Ladden
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 30, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The written agreement to sell land upon which this suit is based is in the following terms: “This agreement, made by and between William and Margaret Ladden of the town of Waterbury, County of New Haven and State of Connecticut, acting herein by his duly authorized agent, D. T. Farrington & Sons of Waterbury, party of the first part, and Mary A. Sullivan, of said Waterbury, party of the second part, Witnesseth: The party of the first part agrees to sell and convey by warranty deed, containing the usual covenants, and the party of the second part agrees to purchase for the sum of $14,700, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gendelman v. MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Shoag v. SheftelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Platt v. Stonington Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
- Griffin v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montanaro v. PandolfiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Dineen v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Wright v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Miller v. VordenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Flynn v. PloufeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.