Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration Between Vanguard Films, Inc. & Samuel Goldwyn Productions, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.
Samuel Goldwyn and Selzniek dealing through Vanguard Films, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “ Selzniek ”), are moving-picture producers. The Astor is a “ first run ” theatre in New York. Seeking an outlet for their pictures, these parties entered into a contract with the owner of the *797Astor — this we will call the three-party contract. On the same date the producers made a kindred contract between themselves— this we will call the two-party contract. Thereafter Goldwyn assigned his rights under both contracts to the petitioner Samuel Goldwyn Productions, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wood Selick v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- In Re the Accounting of FraserNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bradford Co. v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of FraserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Knoll North America, Inc. v. IBF Group, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1993
- In re the Arbitration between United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America & General Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- In re the Arbitration between Terminal Auxiliar Maritima, S. A. & Cocotos Steamship Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949