Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Terminal Auxiliar Maritima, S. A. & Cocotos Steamship Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelix O. Benvenga, J.
This is a motion to confirm an award and to direct the entry of judgment thereon. Respondent opposes the application on jurisdictional grounds. The agreement provides for arbitration in New York. Such an agreement is valid and binding, and is in itself a consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State to enforce the agreement even to' the extent of entering judgment upon the arbitrators’ award, and even though the parties thereto are foreign corporations not authorized io do business in this State (Matter of Galban Lobo Co., 271 App. Div. 310, 312; Matter of Bradford *698Woolen Corp., 189…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Republique Francaise & Cellosilk Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Bradford Woolen Corp. & FreedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- In re the Arbitration Between Vanguard Films, Inc. & Samuel Goldwyn Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- In re the Arbitration between Republique Francaise & Cellosilk Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- A & S Distributing Co. v. Providence Pile Fabric Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Knoll North America, Inc. v. IBF Group, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1993