Legal Opinion

Broad & Wall Corp. v. O'Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment entered on the order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion is denied with leave to renew upon completion of all pretrial proceedings, without costs. On this rather incomplete and unsatisfactory record, a question of fact is presented with respect to the defense of usury alleged in the first complete defense. The defense and the affidavit of Fassoulis allege he, and not Sales Consultants, Inc., is the borrower. Further, an issue of fact is presented with respect to privity. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. . TiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Crittenden v. BarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Crittenden v. BarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Thorer & Hollander, Inc. v. FuchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Gross v. LichtmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Insurance Co. of WausauNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  4. North Fork Bank v. Suffolk County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API