Legal Opinion

Williams v. . Tilt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1867PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davies, Ch.J.

The Defendants, Birch, Nutting-, and Nutting, fraudulently obtained from the Plaintiffs six cases of silks, and sold and transferred them to the Defendants Tilt, who sold four of them to the Defendant Newman.

The complaint as to the Defendants Tilt, Thorp, and Newman, averred “ That the said firm of John S. Birch & Co. put the said silk in the hands of the Defendant, Thorp acting as the agent of the Defendant Tilt, but that said Thorp and Tilt, as the Plaintiffs are informed and believe, received tbe same knowing that it had been obtained under the circumstances above mentioned,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Coddington v. BayCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
  3. Shufelt v. ShufeltNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. Billington v. . WagonerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Lenz v. PrescottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Seidel v. 18 East 17th Street Owners, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Second National Bank v. WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Kay v. . WhittakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Plattner Implement Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API